Now the chances are
if you’re reading this then you will probably have read the first part of the
blog and had your curiosities aroused. If you gave up after the first part then
I’m going to wave my fingers off the end off my nose like a child at you and
once again you will be none the wiser and nothing will have changed in that
time. If however you’ve stumbled across this blog having not read the first one
and are thinking what am I on about then I shall do a brief surmise of what I
was trying to say in the first blog; namely that choosing to read every single
bit of information you find on the current situation at Portsmouth FC day to
day will probably end up being quite detrimental to your health if you’re not
careful. Part One of the blog centered on two players; Tal Ben Haim and Liam
Lawrence, the two remaining senior professionals on the book who were required
to have left the club by the time last Friday’s August 10th deadline
imposed by administrator Trevor Birch had passed. Unless you’ve been caught in
a time continuum since last Friday (and lucky you if you have) you will now
have learned that both players have indeed left the club. The point raised in the
first blog however is that if you follow blind faith alone and read into things
too much or you miss pieces of information that are reported in different
circles that you don’t always check, then the bigger picture may always remain
lost as you search to work out what is really going on behind closed doors.
The last blog looked
at how the local press reported throughout the week how Liam Lawrence could potentially
stay (Monday 6th August) to announcing his departure from the club
(Monday 13th August) and how words used like ‘could’ stay and ‘re-negotiating’
had been taken by fans in some quarters to mean there was actually a chance
that the player would sign a new contract at reduced terms with the Fratton
Park outfit. It ended with a link from the Daily Telegraph in which it’s
claimed that Tal Ben Haim had instructed his agent to stay away from the
negotiating tables. It’s worth remembering at this point claims were strongly made
by his agent the so labelled ‘Super Agent’ Pini Zahavi or should that now be ex
agent? (You decide) that his client would not be playing League One football
next season with Portsmouth. He was totally adamant that this wouldn’t be the
case whatsoever after relegation into League One. So consider the following
points or questions;
Following relegation
from the Championship the world’s most famous agent states categorically that
his client will not be playing for Portsmouth come the new season.
Why did TBH as
reported in the Daily Telegraph ask his agent to stay away from the negotiating
tables?
Why did Andrew
Andronikou claim to be representing the player in negotiations when he is not a
registered Football agent with the FA?
Why did the clubs
administrator Trevor Birch continue with claims against TBH in the media when
TBH claims that he approached all the players after relegation where they all
agreed in principle that they would do whatever was necessary to protect the
club and safeguard it’s future then heard nothing back from the administrator
who kept up his claims in the press?
If you had the world’s
most connected agent in the game worldwide and were TBH ask yourself if the
story published in the Daily Telegraph is true then why would you not want him
representing you if only it was the case that the deal would be quite easy to
conclude?
Looking at the last
point in particular it makes no sense other than to suggest that a deal could
be concluded that easily without the need for a registered agent to be in place
yet this is the one player who was vilified by certain sections of fans as
being public enemy number one by the administrator Trevor Birch. If Pini Zahavi
didn’t conclude the end package as an agent and Andrew Andronikou didn’t have
the authority to conclude the deal because he’s not a registered football agent
with the FA then the deal could have only been done by two parties, namely TBH
and Trevor Birch. So after a week of publically calling each other out in the
public via the media the deal was done just like that. Seems a bit too easy
after all those months of supposedly dragging his heals over a deal don’t you
think? Maybe it’s just me?
So cometh the hour,
cometh the man and we all expected Mr Balram Chanrai to walk back into charge of
the club this week. I expect you are all awaiting some big long winded diatribe
at this juncture especially following yesterday’s announcement that he’s walked
away from the deal. Well, you’d be wrong. The point of these blogs is to try
get you to start to think and not run blindly into things on a day by day basis
and just accept the first couple of things that you read or to forget what had
happened a day earlier, a week back or even a month or so. It’s quite easy to
get caught up in the moment and to forget things when everyone is so fired up.
So instead I am going to back track a month instead and look at something else
that was reported but was by and large either missed or warranted not worthy of
discussion at any time after.
It probably seems a
long time ago now but way back in 2005 the then Pompey owner Sacha Gaydamak
purchased part of the land that surrounds Fratton Park. The car park alone was
purchased for £3.5 million and the offices in Anson Road are said to be on
prime development land despite muted notes to the contrary that have been
expressed by some quarters in the past 24 hours. This land is joined by other areas
that are dotted around the ground.
The land is being
sold after Mr Gaydamak and the other Directors in the firm put the holding
company Miland Development 2004 Limited into administration.
So what does that have to do with
Portsmouth if we don’t actually own the land? Well here comes the twist because
remember it’s not only Trevor Birch that is currently working on the best deal
as an administrator. On Wednesday the 11th of July The News reported
that Administrator Glyn Middleton of David Rubin and Partners would be approaching
Trevor Birch of PKF to see whether a deal could be done to include the land in
the sale of the football club. If successful the land added to the sale of the club could attract more
bids from potential owners eager to develop the area. At that juncture Mr
Middleton was quoted as saying;
‘We’re in the process of instructing agents to
assess the value of the land around the football club.
‘Our intention would be to have a meeting with the administrators of the
football club to potentially combine any sale of the land with the sale of the
club, if that’s what the club’s purchasers want to do.’
Mr Birch confirmed he had been approached about the issue, but said it
was still very early on in the process.
He added: ‘We will be meeting with the administrator of Miland
Development to discuss the situation.
So what ramifications would that have for the club
and its value? Well if the land was sold alongside the club as a package it
would open way for long-mooted plans to redevelop Fratton Park and thus enable shops
and restaurants to be build on the site. As always with Pompey there’s another twist
in the tale. Baker Tilly (remember them?) have begun proceedings against both
Miland Developments and Sacha Gaydamak personally in order to be able to seize
the land and to sell it off in order to benefit Pompey’s creditors from 2010
(remember them also?) Baker Tilly also
claim that Mr Gaydamak is not the legal owner of the land and it should belong
to Portsmouth Football Club.
Baker Tilly have begun proceedings against both
Miland Developments and Mr Gaydamak personally in an attempt to seize the land
which will enable them to sell it off in order to benefit the Pompey Creditor’s
owed money back in 2010 from the previous administration. The proceedings have
been confirmed by Geoff Carton-Kelly who is handling the liquidation who would
not comment on the situation however Mike Dyer representing Verisona Solicitors
was quoted as saying ‘The land could still be sold with the permission of the
liquidators, so a deal could be done.’
Unsurprisingly at
that time Mr Gaydamak was unavailable for comment on the matter.
Remember this was
reported in the news on July the 11th of 2012 not half a year ago or
a year ago but little over a month ago. So what does this mean? Well I can only
tell you what I understand it to mean and please hold in thought before reading
on that I am not a trained solicitor or the such like so if I am proved wrong
by someone eminently far more qualified and is happy to be quoted at such times
then I will happily republish this blog with some glorious legal terms for you
all.
So here’s how I take
Baker Tilly’s undertakings to mean for the club;
Basically if Baker
Tilly are successful in their attempts to seize the land back then the best
solution for them in trying to gain the best deal for their clients from the
previous administration will be to see a deal done whereby the land is given
back to Portsmouth FC which would make the club a far more attractive
proposition to any potential buyers. This land at the time was brought in a
deal worth close to £5 million and as I mentioned the car park alone was
purchased for a sum of £3.5 million. Far from being as has been suggested in
some quarters quite worthless, the land in the right hands could be the clubs
potential lifeline if reunited as one package. To refute suggestions that the
land is worthless you have to only ask yourself why back in 2005 that so much
was paid for it in the first place. Currently focus is only being given to the
value of Fratton Park which is valued at around £2 million. Whilst I appreciate
that land prices have depreciated greatly there are companies always looking
for prime locations especially inland and the name of Tesco’s has been muted on
more than one occasion as a potential purchaser of the land, whilst other
suggestions have been made that campus’s could be built and rented back to the
University of Portsmouth which would guarantee the club an income through the
months of the off season. Having seen the Portsmouth County Council grant a loan
to the Supporters Trust for once we as fans might believe that they could also
grant planning restrictions in the area that would help safe guard the long
term financial stability of the club and see the club become self efficient.
So as I said this isn’t
a diatribe to the arguments that rumble on elsewhere. I have no wish to get
involved in any such discussions I am here to point out some of what else is
going on around the scenes that may have been overlooked.
But just in case you’re
curious, I very much doubt we have heard the last of one Mr Balram Chanrai no
matter what he might have us all belief in his press statements made yesterday.
One final note if you
will and cast your mind’s back to the team of youngsters that played against
Plymouth on Wednesday night and performed so well in such difficult
circumstances. Most quarters were quoted as saying that we’d have to field the
same side against AFC Bournemouth in our opening games this Saturday yet
reports are now suggesting we will have signed 10 players on non contract terms
before the game. Funny how things change so quickly in 24 hours isn’t it…
17:02 16th August 2012 Update.. As promised above any errors admitting to any statement I had made will be noted for those who are reading. The land registry values Fratton Park in the region of £7.5 million and not as is stated in the figures above. I do however keep the original figure in to reflect the honesty of what the two blogs have been trying to put across.
17:02 16th August 2012 Update.. As promised above any errors admitting to any statement I had made will be noted for those who are reading. The land registry values Fratton Park in the region of £7.5 million and not as is stated in the figures above. I do however keep the original figure in to reflect the honesty of what the two blogs have been trying to put across.
No comments:
Post a Comment